aphant.org

Writers with aphantasia

People who write fiction (or want to) without an inner cinema — what makes it possible, what makes it harder, and the famous names they reach for as proof it can be done.

What people actually say

"It's possible. I just did it."

The most matter-of-fact register in the bundle: writers who note, often briefly, that aphantasia did not stop them from finishing a novel or building a body of work. The tone is almost flat — not triumphant, just true.

"Yep, I've had near-total aphantasia my whole life, but I still wrote a whole sci-fi novel a few years back." 2026 · t1_oau5zgr ↗

"I think aphantasia is a writing superpower." 2021 · t1_heip6m8 ↗

"When I write fiction, I can't exactly see what is happening in my head, but I think of the emotional fallout and how specific characters would behave. I think it helps." 2024 · t1_lnrct2y ↗

Frustration, blockage, and "I'm just bad at this"

The opposite cluster is just as well-populated. Several writers describe fiction as the genre they cannot crack — descriptions feel mechanical, characters won't come alive, and for some, the diagnosis itself was actively de-motivating.

"I find writing fiction quite difficult. I just can't get the detail needed in order for my characters to come to life." 2017 · t1_diyxerz ↗

"I was a fairly quick writer for essays and such, but absolute garbage at writing fiction. Could never figure out how folks were able to write such detailed scenery lol" 2021 · t1_heip6m8 ↗

"Learning that I have aphantasia has destroyed both my ability and motivation to write. I now struggle with writing scenes and imagery and have fallen into using excessive exposition instead of letting the story progress in-scene." 2021 · t1_gywwp9f ↗

"Sometimes it's incredibly depressing, feeling limited, wishing I could visualize the amazing worlds and characters I've imagined. But it's very possible to write." 2020 · t3_gu3a5g ↗

Workarounds: dialogue, white space, emotional logic

Writers who do publish describe a fairly consistent toolkit. They lean away from extended visual description and toward dialogue, internal monologue, mood, and trusting the reader to fill in the picture.

"When I read and write I gravitate towards dialogue." 2020 · t3_h8wlzc ↗

"So yeah, when I'm writing fiction, I tend to limit my visual descriptions and focus more on dialogue/inner thoughts." 2020 · t3_h8wlzc ↗

"It's better to give them 2+2 and let the reader imagine 4 that to just describe 4 to them." 2020 · t3_h8wlzc ↗

"Look at all these published authors who have it"

A recurring move in the threads — especially in 2026 after Andy Weir's NPR interview — is to produce a roster of working novelists with aphantasia. The list functions as reassurance for newcomers asking whether writing is even worth attempting.

"I keep a list of authors who have said they have aphantasia." 2026 · t1_oj2l78f ↗

"The Witcher author has aphantasia and even though as a hyperphant it’s not my favorite stylistically, a lot of people love it obviously haha." 2020 · t1_fg5u3nn ↗

"Just heard his NPR interview and raced right here!" 2026 · t1_ob5m4ay ↗

Across the years

The split between "I do it fine" and "I can't get scenery to work" is present from the earliest 2017 chunks and persists straight through 2026. What changes is mostly the citation pool: 2017–2020 threads tend to invoke Sapkowski (the Witcher author) as the lone counterexample, while 2024 brings John Green into the conversation, and 2026 is dominated by reactions to Andy Weir's public disclosure — five of the bundle's 30 chunks come from that single thread. The 2020 cluster (8 chunks) reflects two foundational posts ("Any fiction writers with aphantasia?" and "Writing with aphantasia") where the dialogue/white-space workaround was first articulated in detail; later years mostly recycle and reinforce that toolkit rather than replacing it.

Volume

Year Chunks tagged
2017 3
2019 1
2020 8
2021 4
2022 3
2024 5
2025 1
2026 5

Cross-references